[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 56.31 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 56.31 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 56.31 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [56.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56.31) 疏「若唯識」下，第四正顯斷義。於中三：一正顯唯識、二明順違、三顯當宗。初中，言「二真見道」者，彼疏不釋。有云：謂真見道及相見道。此釋非理，言二真故，斷惑正在真見道故。有云：人法二空。此亦難依，二空所證今說能斷故。有云：無間解脫為二。此二應非斷惑，正在無間道故。若爾，何者指南？應是大小乘為二故。次前論云「二乘見道現在前時，唯斷一種，名得聖性。菩薩見道現在前時，具斷二種，名得聖性。」二種即二障，所斷廣狹小異，大小俱是真見道斷故。然彼論意為異薩婆多宗。彼宗所立見道之前斷異生性，無間道起與惑得俱說言斷耳。故為伏難云：若異生性見道前捨，無漏果起，無有凡聖俱成就失。今既依於見斷種立，即無間道有惑種俱。異生未斷，如何凡聖無俱成失？故《唯識論》云「見道起時彼種不成，猶如明生不與闇並，故凡聖二性無俱成失。若無間道與惑得俱，却有凡聖俱成之失。」《雜集》第七亦明此義。 > On the commentary's "If according to Consciousness-Only" and below: fourth, it properly reveals the meaning of severing. Within this are three parts: 1. properly revealing Consciousness-Only; 2. clarifying conformity and conflict; 3. revealing the present tradition. In the first, regarding "two real paths of seeing," that commentary does not explain it. Some say: it means the real path of seeing and the path of seeing with characteristics. This explanation is unreasonable, because it says "two real," and the severing of afflictions takes place precisely during the real path of seeing. Some say: the two emptinesses of person and phenomena. This is also difficult to rely on, because the two emptinesses are what is realized, whereas here it speaks of that which is able to sever. Some say: the uninterrupted and liberation \[paths\] make two. These two should not be, because the severing of afflictions takes place precisely on the uninterrupted path. If so, what is the guide? It should be that the Great and Small Vehicles make two. Just prior to this, the treatise says: "When the path of seeing of the two vehicles manifests, it only severs one kind, which is called attaining the noble nature; when the bodhisattva's path of seeing manifests, it fully severs both kinds, which is called attaining the noble nature." The two kinds are precisely the two obscurations; there is a slight difference in the breadth and narrowness of what is severed, but for both the Great and Small \[Vehicles\] it is severed by the real path of seeing. However, the intent of that treatise is to differentiate from the Sarvāstivāda school. What that school posited is that before the path of seeing one abandons ordinary-being-nature, and when the uninterrupted path arises concurrent with the acquisition of afflictions, it is said to sever. Therefore, raising a tacit objection: "If ordinary-being-nature is renounced before the path of seeing, and the undefiled fruit arises, there is no fault of both ordinary and noble being simultaneously accomplished. Now, since it is posited based on the seeds severed by seeing, then the uninterrupted path has affliction-seeds concurrent with it. With the ordinary being not yet severed, how is there no fault of both ordinary and noble being simultaneously accomplished?" Thus the Cheng weishi lun says: "When the path of seeing arises, those seeds are not established, just as when light arises it does not coexist with darkness; hence there is no fault of both ordinary and noble natures being simultaneously accomplished. If the uninterrupted path were concurrent with the acquisition of afflictions, on the contrary there would be the fault of both ordinary and noble being simultaneously accomplished." The seventh fascicle of the Samuccaya also clarifies this meaning. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 56.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56.30) - [Next: 56.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56.32) - [Up: 56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.56.31) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (3) - [成唯識論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.trimsika!vijnaptimatratasiddhi*zh-xuanzang.9.154) — Classical Chinese - [大方廣佛華嚴經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.33.14) — Classical Chinese - [唯識三十論要釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2804.1.47.2) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.56.31) · Pramāṇa