[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 57.28 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 57.28 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 57.28 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [57.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57.28) 疏「三所斷障」等者，於中三：初總標、二「謂二障」下明斷障、三明斷愚。二中，先舉《唯識》釋、後「此言異生」下引梁論辯。前中意明，依分別障種立異生性障，分別揀於俱生，種揀現起。分別之言，此言猶漫。而本論云「凡夫我相障，知是我執故。」下二愚名執著我法愚，彼論釋云「雖初地所斷，實通二障，而異生性障意取所知，說十無明非染污行。」疏「上來就能起」下，三釋斷二愚。文中三：初以義生起、二「由斯初地」下引論正釋、三斷義。「如前」，下結示斷義。二中，言「斷二愚」，即是現行及彼麁重者。彼論釋云「顯彼二種」。次文釋云「或二所起無堪任性，如入二空說斷苦根，所斷苦根雖非現種而名麁重，此亦應然。彼麁重言，例亦應釋。」 > Regarding the Commentary's text from 'Third, the obstacles to be severed' downwards, within it there are three: first, a general indication; second, from 'Meaning the two obstacles' downwards, clarifying the severance of obstacles; third, clarifying the severance of delusions. In the second part, he first raises the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi's explanation, and afterward, from 'This term "ordinary worldling"' downwards, cites the Liang treatise for discernment. In the former, the intent clarifies that based on the seeds of the discriminative obstacle, the obstacle of the nature of ordinary worldlings is established. 'Discriminative' distinguishes it from the innate; 'seeds' distinguishes it from active manifestations. The term 'discriminative' here is still broad. But the root treatise states: 'The obstacle of the self-characteristic of ordinary worldlings, knowing that it is grasping at a self.' Below, the two delusions are named the delusion of grasping at self and dharmas; that treatise's commentary states: 'Although severed on the first ground, in reality it permeates both obstacles; yet the obstacle of the nature of ordinary worldlings primarily takes cognizable \[objects\], stating that the ten non-enlightenments are non-defiled activities.' In the Commentary, 'From the above, in terms of what can arise' downwards is third: explaining the severance of the two delusions. The text has three parts: first, generating it through meaning; second, from 'Due to this, on the first ground' downwards, citing the treatise to explain directly; third, the meaning of severance. 'As before' downwards concludes and indicates the meaning of severance. In the second part, the statement 'severing the two delusions' refers to active manifestations and their coarse heaviness. That treatise's commentary states: 'Manifesting those two kinds.' The subsequent text explains: 'Or the incapacity produced by the two, just as entering the two emptinesses is said to sever the root of suffering. Although the root of suffering to be severed is neither active manifestation nor seed, it is named coarse heaviness; here too it should be like this. That word "coarse heaviness" should also be explained by analogy.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 57.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57.27) - [Next: 57.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57.29) - [Up: 57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.57.28) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [成唯識論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.trimsika!vijnaptimatratasiddhi*zh-xuanzang.9.162) — Classical Chinese - [華嚴經探玄記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1733.10.26) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.57.28) · Pramāṇa