[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 59.32 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 59.32 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 59.32 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [59.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59.32) 疏「相及得果」等者，是所得法相。疏文有三：初依論釋相、次出體、三再顯法體。疏「相即方便智」下，疏出其體，即同如來加請中三漸次也。言「能所觀相」者，相有其二義：一相差別故；二能到地實故名為相。即觀漸次觀，即舉障顯治相，則能所皆相，二得即證漸次，三果即修行漸次。疏「又此三者」下，三再顯法體。開根本智以成二道，故不取加行。言「地上加行勝進收故」者，如欲入第二起十種心，此即加行，而是初地之勝進。意云：勝進既是後得，故非方便。 > Regarding the Commentary's statement: "The characteristics, the fruit attained," and so forth: these are the characteristics of the attained Dharma. The text of the Commentary has three parts: first, explaining the characteristics according to the treatise; second, pointing out their essence; third, re-elucidating the essence of the Dharma. Regarding the Commentary's statement: "Characteristics are expedient cognition" and so forth: the Commentary points out their essence, which is identical to the three gradations in the Tathāgata's empowerment and request. As for the words "characteristics of that which contemplates and that which is contemplated": "characteristic" has two meanings. First, because of the distinction of characteristics; second, because of being able to reach the reality of the ground, they are called characteristics. That is, the gradation of contemplation. Contemplation precisely brings forth the obstacles to reveal the characteristics of the antidotes; thus both that which \[contemplates\] and that which is \[contemplated\] are characteristics. Second, "attainment" is the gradation of realization. Third, "fruit" is the gradation of cultivation. Regarding the Commentary's statement: "Moreover, these three" and so forth: third, it re-elucidates the essence of the Dharma. It opens fundamental cognition to form the two paths; thus it does not take preparatory application. As for the statement: "Preparatory application on the grounds is subsumed under superior progression": as when wishing to enter the second ground one generates ten types of mind, this is preparatory application, yet it is the superior progression of the first ground. The intended meaning is: since superior progression is subsequent attainment, it is not expedient means. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 59.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59.31) - [Next: 59.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59.33) - [Up: 59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.59.32) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.59.32) · Pramāṇa