<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.52 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 6.52

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 6.52

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 6.52

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.52)

疏「是知」下，會通教旨。於中又三：一明會不會之意、二明會二會三之意、三明取昔廢昔之意。上三段展轉通難。謂初有難云：既許昔三皆權，何言抑諸聖教？故今釋云：非不許其四乘，但昔大不分權實，故成抑諸實教耳。

> Regarding the commentary's phrase "From this it is known": reconciling the import of the teachings. Within this there are again three: first, clarifying the intention of integrating or not integrating; second, clarifying the intention of integrating two or integrating three; third, clarifying the intention of adopting the past or discarding the past. The above three sections resolve difficulties in succession. That is to say, first there is an objection that says: "Since it is accepted that all three of the past are provisional, why say that it suppresses all the noble teachings?" Therefore, it is now explained: it is not that four vehicles are not accepted, but because the past Mahāyāna did not distinguish provisional and real, it results in suppressing all the real teachings.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.51)
- [Next: 6.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.53)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.6.52) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.6.52) · Pramāṇa
