[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 61.105 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.105 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.105 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [61.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.105) 疏「二約地中」下，此釋有四：一引論正釋。然《唯識》文即《攝論》意，次下正引，即《攝論》第七意。世親釋云「由此地中安住最勝菩提分法，由住此故，能燒一切根本煩惱及隨煩惱皆為灰燼。然以菩提分而為慧者，非皆是慧，慧之焰故，從喻為名也。」二「由住第四」下，以文成上約地中義。三「若唯」下，反成前義。四「以此地正明」下，釋妨難。難云：若許此第一釋者，何以諸論多依第二？故為此通，通意可知。於中文二：先正通、後「攝論云」下出多釋文。略舉五釋：一《攝論》，即上第七論。二《莊嚴論》，當第十三。三引《瑜伽論》，亦即第四，文多同前。四引《金光明》，即第三經，云「能燒煩惱以智慧光，增長光明故，是修行道品依處，是故四地名為焰慧。」五引《顯揚》，亦當第三，論云「焰慧地者，謂諸菩薩住此地中，先善修治第三地故，超過一切聲聞緣覺地，證得極清淨緣諸覺分能取法境，微妙慧蘊能現前，燒一切煩惱，是故此地名為焰慧。」然上五釋，義皆相成，故疏總云「不殊此意」。 > Regarding the commentary from "second, in terms of \[what occurs\] within the ground" below: This explanation has four parts: first, citing the treatise for the primary explanation. Now, the text of the Vijñaptimātratā expresses the meaning of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha; what is directly cited next is the meaning of the seventh \[fascicle\] of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha. Vasubandhu explains: "Because within this ground one dwells in the supreme factors of bodhi, by dwelling in this, one is able to burn all fundamental afflictions and secondary afflictions into ashes. However, taking the factors of bodhi to be wisdom does not mean they are all wisdom; because they are the radiance of wisdom, it is named after this metaphor." Second, from "by dwelling in the Fourth" below, \[the commentary\] confirms the above meaning of \[what occurs\] within the ground by means of the text. Third, from "if only" below, it indirectly confirms the preceding meaning. Fourth, from "because this ground directly clarifies" below, it resolves an objection. The objection says: If one accepts this first explanation, why do the treatises mostly follow the second? Therefore, this explanation is given; its purport can be known. Within this, there are two parts: first, the primary resolution; next, from "the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says" below, it presents many textual explanations. It briefly raises five explanations: First, the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, which is the seventh fascicle above. Second, the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra, corresponding to the thirteenth \[fascicle\]. Third, citing the Yogācārabhūmi, which is also the fourth, its text being largely the same as before. Fourth, citing the Suvarṇaprabhāsa, which is the third fascicle of the sūtra, stating: "Because it can burn afflictions with the light of wisdom and increase illumination, it is the basis for cultivating the factors of the path; therefore, the Fourth Ground is called Radiant." Fifth, citing the Prakaraṇāryavācā, which also corresponds to the third \[fascicle\]; the treatise says: "The Radiant Ground means that when bodhisattvas dwell in this ground, because they have previously well cultivated and purified the Third Ground, they transcend all grounds of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, realize extremely pure cognition of all factors of awakening as the cognitive object, and their subtle wisdom-aggregate is able to manifest and burn all afflictions; therefore, this ground is named Radiant." Now, the meanings of these five explanations all support one another; hence, the commentary generally states that "they do not differ from this intention." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 61.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.104) - [Next: 61.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.106) - [Up: 61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.61.105) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.105) · Pramāṇa