[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 61.50 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.50 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.50 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [61.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.50) 疏「若依小乘」下，約教揀異。故《俱捨》云「初二樂輕安」，則顯前論皆約樂受。「又此正斷」下，明其所宜，此亦遮難。難言：一種相攝，何不舉不憂不喜攝苦樂耶？答云：一五受中無別名故；二所對樂近，憂苦遠故，先已斷故。 > Regarding the commentary's "If according to the Hīnayāna" downward: it distinguishes differences according to the teachings. Thus the Kośa says: "The first two have the bliss of pliancy", which shows that the previous treatises all referred to the feeling of bliss (sukha-vedanā). From "Furthermore, this directly severs" downward clarifies its appropriateness; this also fends off an objection. The objection says: Being subsumed in the same manner, why not raise neither-grief-nor-joy to subsume suffering and bliss? The reply says: First, among the five sensations there is no distinct name; second, the bliss it opposes is near, whereas grief and suffering are far, having been severed previously. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 61.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.49) - [Next: 61.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.51) - [Up: 61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.61.50) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.50) · Pramāṇa