[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 61.60 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.60 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.60 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [61.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.60) 疏「皆云想」者，第三別釋想字。先依小乘、後依大乘。前中《俱舍》云「亦總名除色想」。然無色亦二：一者生得，生得即果，果滅色形。二者修得，修得在因，身居欲色修空定時，但滅於想。應有問言：何不滅餘？故疏答云「想取色相故偏說滅」，非不滅餘。 > Under the Commentary's "All say 'notion'," the third part explains the word 'notion' (saṃjñā) in particular: first according to the Hīnayāna, and then according to the Mahāyāna. In the former, the Kośa says: "It is also generally called eliminating the notion of form." However, the formless is also twofold: first, obtained by birth; obtained by birth is the fruit, and the fruit extinguishes material shape. Second, obtained by cultivation; obtained by cultivation is in the cause: when a body residing in the desire or form realms cultivates the absorption of space, it only extinguishes the notion. A question might be asked: Why not extinguish the rest? Therefore the Commentary answers: "Because notions grasp the characteristics of form, it specifically speaks of extinguishing \[them\]," not that it does not extinguish the rest. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 61.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.59) - [Next: 61.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.61) - [Up: 61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.61.60) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.61.60) · Pramāṇa