[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 62.54 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 62.54 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 62.54 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [62.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62.54) 疏「亦非色非不色、雙照色不色」者，即第二約性相以明三觀，則一多相並。上之數皆屬相攝，非色為性。文但顯中，略無空假。若具應言：法性緣生故色，緣生即空故非色，法性即中故非色非不色等。亦具遮照中道之義。 > As for the Commentary's text, “It is also neither matter nor non-matter, and illuminates both matter and non-matter,” this is the second part, which clarifies the three contemplations with reference to nature and characteristics; then the one and the many stand alongside each other. All of the numbers above belong to the mutual inclusion of characteristics; non-matter is the nature. The text merely reveals the middle, keeping empty and provisional implicit. If fully stated, it should say: because conditioned arising is from the dharmatā, it is matter; because conditioned arising is empty, it is non-matter; because the dharmatā is middle, it is neither matter nor non-matter, and so forth. It also fully possesses the meaning of the middle way of negation and illumination. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 62.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62.53) - [Next: 62.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62.55) - [Up: 62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.62.54) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [大方廣佛華嚴經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.37.16) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.62.54) · Pramāṇa