[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 64.12 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.12 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [64.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.12) 疏「染相未亡對染說淨亦名取淨」者，此通伏難。難云：前地觀於淨如，染慢許生，何有淨慢？故今答云：前所觀如，入觀則能，出觀隨有猶見染相。染相既存，對染苦集還生淨相滅道之見，故有斯慢。雖有三重救難，染淨之相皆存。 > Regarding the commentary's "when the marks of defilement have not yet perished, speaking of purity in contrast to defilement is also called grasping purity": this resolves a hidden objection. The objection says: On the previous ground, when contemplating pure tathatā, conceits of defilement may be allowed to arise, but how could there be a conceit of purity? Therefore, it now answers: regarding the tathatā contemplated previously, one is capable while entering contemplation, but upon emerging from contemplation, as occurrences take place, one still sees marks of defilement. Since the marks of defilement still exist, in contrast to the suffering and origination of defilement, there still arises the view of the marks of purity—cessation and the path; therefore, this conceit exists. Although there are three tiers of rescues against the objection, the marks of both defilement and purity still persist. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 64.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.11) - [Next: 64.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.13) - [Up: 64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.64.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.12) · Pramāṇa