<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.79 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 64.79

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.79

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.79

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [64.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.79)

疏「然唯識論」下，第二會通《集論》，欲顯不同。故舉《集論》識通能所引，是彼所立正取業種，是出所以。以行熏心，招當果識，故為識支。若爾，識種何收？故云名色，名色寬故。

> Regarding the commentary's statement "However, the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra" and what follows, the second part harmonizes with the Abhidharmasamuccaya, wishing to reveal their differences. Therefore, citing that the Abhidharmasamuccaya takes consciousness as pervading both the projecting and the projected, this is its established position; it directly takes the seed of karma, which identifies its rationale. Because formations perfume the mind, inviting the consciousness of the future effect, it is therefore the link of consciousness. If so, under what is the seed of consciousness subsumed? Therefore it says name-and-form, because name-and-form is broad.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 64.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.78)
- [Next: 64.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.80)
- [Up: 64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.64.79) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.79) · Pramāṇa
