[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 64.98 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.98 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 64.98 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [64.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.98) 疏「我語等取為我慢故」者，即上論云「緣愛後生，故等四取。」釋曰：謂一欲取、二見取、三戒取、四我語取。今順經中，我慢之言先舉我語，以等餘三。言欲取者，謂取五妙欲境故。《瑜伽》云「欲取云何？謂於諸欲所生貪欲。見取云何？謂除薩迦耶見，於所餘見所有貪欲。戒禁取云何？謂於邪願所有貪欲。我語取云何？謂於薩迦耶見所有貪欲。」有人釋云：戒謂惡戒，禁謂狗牛等禁。我語謂內識，依之說我故。有餘師說：我見我慢名為我語。云何此二獨名我語？由此二種說有我故。我非有故，說名我語。如契經說「苾芻當知，愚昧無聞於異生類，隨假言說起於我執，於中無我及與我所（云云）。」《瑜伽》云「欲取唯生欲界苦果，餘三通生三界苦果。」 > Regarding “Grasping at self-discourse and so forth constitutes self-pride”: this refers to the above treatise saying, “Arising after being conditioned by craving, hence 'and so forth' comprises the four graspings.” Explanation says: namely, 1. Sensual grasping, 2. Grasping at views, 3. Grasping at precepts, and 4. Grasping at self-discourse. Now, in accordance with the sūtra, the phrase 'self-pride' first adduces self-discourse to imply the remaining three under “and so forth.” 'Sensual grasping' means grasping at the five wondrous sensual objects. The Yogācāra\[bhūmi\] says: “What is sensual grasping? It refers to greedy desire produced with respect to the various desires. What is grasping at views? It refers to all greedy desire with respect to remaining views, excluding the view of individuality (satkāyadṛṣṭi). What is grasping at precepts and observances? It refers to all greedy desire with respect to evil vows. What is grasping at self-discourse? It refers to all greedy desire with respect to the view of individuality.” Someone explained: Precepts refer to bad precepts; observances refer to the observances of dogs, cows, and so forth. Self-discourse refers to internal consciousness, in reliance on which a self is spoken of. Other masters say: The view of a self and pride of a self are named self-discourse. Why are these two alone called self-discourse? Because based on these two, one speaks of the existence of a self. Because a self does not exist, it is named self-discourse. As the sūtra says: “Bhikṣus, you should know that foolish, unlearned ordinary people, following nominal designations, give rise to attachment to a self, within which there is neither self nor what belongs to a self,” and so on. The Yogācāra\[bhūmi\] says: “Sensual grasping generates only the suffering results of the desire realm; the remaining three generally generate the suffering results of the three realms.” > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 64.97](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.97) - [Next: 64.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.99) - [Up: 64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.64.98) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.64.98) · Pramāṇa