<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.41 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 65.41

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 65.41

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 65.41

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [65.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.41)

疏「二約大悲」下，疏文有二：先標章、後「論總」下解釋。於中三：一總釋、二別釋、三却釋事觀。今初，先舉論；「謂十二」下；疏釋論。遠公亦云：「不緣無我，故曰愚癡。謬執有我，稱曰顛倒。」此言小局。

> Regarding the Commentary's "Second, in terms of great compassion" down: the text of the Commentary has two \[parts\]: first it sets forth the heading, and then from "The treatise generally…" down it explains it. Within this, there are three \[subdivisions\]: first, a general explanation; second, a specific explanation; third, explaining back the contemplation of phenomena. Now for the first, it first cites the treatise; from "Namely, the twelve…" down, the Commentary explains the treatise. Master Yuan also said: "Not cognizing no-self is called delusion. Erroneously grasping that there is a self is termed inversion." This statement is somewhat restrictive.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 65.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.40)
- [Next: 65.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.42)
- [Up: 65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.65.41) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.65.41) · Pramāṇa
