[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 67.52 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 67.52 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 67.52 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [67.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67.52) 第十無所有盡門。疏「然論經」下，二會二經。今經兩段皆隨順無所有。若論經順觀中，經論皆隨順有逆觀，方云隨順無所有盡。疏家但含順觀之中順有順無，逆觀義同，所以不會。今經取緣生無性，論經即無性緣生，二義相成，故同遣無因。從「無因何失」下，是論結無因之過。「無定因」者，若有定因，因會則生、不會不生。今無定因，故應常生。「故無因」下，結無因過。《中論》云「無因乃成大過。謂布施持戒應墮地獄，殺生偷盜則應生天，諸修妙行無涅槃等。」 > The tenth gate: Non-existence and Exhaustion. Regarding the commentary from "However, the treatise's sūtra" downward: this reconciles the two sūtras. In the present sūtra, both passages accord with non-existence. In the treatise's sūtra, in the forward contemplation both the sūtra and treatise accord with existence, and only in the reverse contemplation do they speak of according with non-existence and exhaustion. The commentator simply embraced the concordance with existence and concordance with non-existence within the forward contemplation, and because the meaning of the reverse contemplation is identical, he did not reconcile them. The present sūtra adopts the absence of intrinsic nature in conditioned arising, while the treatise's sūtra adopts conditioned arising without intrinsic nature; the two meanings complement each other, and thus both equally eliminate causelessness. From "What is the fault of causelessness?" downward: this is the treatise concluding the fault of causelessness. "Having no definite cause": if there were a definite cause, then when causes assembled it would arise, and when they did not assemble it would not arise; since there would now be no definite cause, it would have to arise perpetually. From "therefore, causelessness" downward: concluding the fault of causelessness. The Madhyamakaśāstra states: "Causelessness would result in great faults: giving and keeping the precepts would lead to falling into hell, while killing and stealing would result in being born in heaven, and all those cultivating exquisite practices would have no nirvāṇa, and so forth." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 67.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67.51) - [Next: 67.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67.53) - [Up: 67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.67.52) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.67.52) · Pramāṇa