[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 70.54 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 70.54 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 70.54 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [70.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.54) 疏「初二黑白相對」等者，釋論對差別。然其論經具有四句，云黑業、白業、黑白業、非黑非白業。論釋云「黑業對白業。白業對黑業。不黑不白對二業，二業即是第三黑白業也。」故云「後二漏無漏」，無漏即亦黑亦白業故。又今黑黑之言，全依《俱舍》，次下當引。疏「四中初一因果俱惡」下，別釋。然以惡釋於黑，乃是通義。別者，因惡染污，果惡鄙穢，不可愛樂。通以善釋於白，別亦不同，因白體不染污，果白則可愛樂故。然上黑是因，能招黑果故。下黑是果，能酬黑因故。白因白果，例此可知。 > Regarding the Commentary's statement, "The first two are the pairing of black and white," and so forth: this explains the distinctions paired in the treatise. Now, the treatise-sūtra fully possesses four propositions: black karma, white karma, black-and-white karma, and neither-black-nor-white karma. The treatise's explanation says: "Black karma is paired with white karma. White karma is paired with black karma. Neither-black-nor-white karma is paired with the two karmas; the 'two karmas' refers to the third, black-and-white karma." Hence it says, "the latter two are with-outflow and without-outflow," because without-outflow karma is also that which is both black and white. Furthermore, the present phrasing of "black-black" relies entirely on the Abhidharmakośa, which will be cited immediately below. Under the Commentary's statement, "Among the four, the first one has both cause and result being evil," it explains them separately. Now, explaining "black" by "evil" is the general meaning. The specific distinction is: the cause is evil because it is defiled; the result is evil because it is base and vile, not to be loved or delighted in. Generally explaining "white" by "good," the specific distinction is also different: the cause is white because its nature is undefiled; the result is white because it is to be loved and delighted in. However, the black in the former position is the cause, because it can incur a black result. The black in the latter position is the result, because it can repay a black cause. The white cause and white result may be understood analogously by this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 70.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.53) - [Next: 70.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.55) - [Up: 70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.70.54) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.54) · Pramāṇa