<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.7 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 70.7

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 70.7

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 70.7

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [70.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.7)

疏「言為六」下，二依論釋。初染治中功用。小願魔業皆是業染。第七地功用之心名功用行，第六地中樂空之心名小乘願，前五地中著有之心名諸魔業。亦可七地中所起行修名功用行，二乘之心名小乘願，凡夫之心名諸魔業。今離功用，治功用行，遠離有無間隔過故，治小願魔業，故名不動。此一為總，故諸經論皆立此名。疏「三有二句發行清淨」者，即勝進中發修離過。前句發修之時離功用過，名為發淨。後句修行之時離不成過，名為行淨，隨意成故。「論經名王子」者，經云「名為王子地，離家過故。」遠公釋云：「如世王子，生在王家，無有營農等過。菩薩如是，生在佛家，無有修行功用之過。」釋曰：觀經之意，但取離過。

> Regarding the Commentary from 'It states, forming six' downward: second, the explanation based on the treatise. In the initial \[pair\], defilement and cure, effort, lesser vows, and māra activities are all karmic defilements. The mind of effort in the seventh stage is called effortful practice; the mind delighting in emptiness in the sixth stage is called lesser vehicle vows; the mind attached to existence in the first five stages is called various māra activities. Alternatively, the practice generated in the seventh stage is called effortful practice; the mind of the two vehicles is called lesser vehicle vows; the mind of ordinary beings is called various māra activities. Now, departing from effort cures effortful practice, and by far transcending the fault of intervals between existence and non-existence, it cures lesser vows and māra activities; hence it is named 'Immovable.' This one is general, and so all sūtras and treatises establish this name. Regarding the Commentary's phrase 'Third, there are two phrases on the purity of initiating practice': this refers to departing from faults in initiating and cultivating during superior progress. The former phrase means that at the time of initiating practice, one departs from the fault of effort, which is called purity of initiation. The latter phrase means that at the time of cultivating practice, one departs from the fault of non-accomplishment, which is called purity of practice, because it is accomplished at will. Regarding 'The treatise's sūtra text names it the prince': the sūtra states: 'It is named the stage of the prince, because of departing from the faults of household life.' Master Yuan explained: 'Just as a worldly prince is born into a royal family and is free from the faults of farming and so forth, so too the bodhisattva is born into the Buddha's family and is free from the fault of effort in cultivation.' Explanation: looking at the intent of the sūtra, it solely takes the departure from faults.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 70.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.6)
- [Next: 70.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.8)
- [Up: 70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.70.7) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.70.7) · Pramāṇa
