[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 71.43 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 71.43 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 71.43 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [71.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71.43) 疏「九實非實」下，後二約人。疏「亦舍三乘餘習之相」者，《智論》第三云「譬如香在器中，其香雖去，習氣故在。譬如人被縛，初得脫時，身猶不便。」如畢陵伽罵恒河女，亦第三論。舍利弗嗔，亦第三論。謂身子為上座，羅睺羅瘦。佛問其故。彼說偈云：「若人食油則得力，若食酥者得好色，食麻滓者無氣力，大德世尊自當知。」佛問：「誰為上座？」答：「和上舍利弗。」佛言：「舍利弗食不淨食。」令日中炙。後復令止，不肯歸，已炙不合止。佛遂引昔為蛇傷王，呪師設火坑，令其嗽毒。若不嗽者，當入火坑。彼自思惟：「我已能吐，云何更嗽？」遂投身入火。故其嗔習至今不已。其大迦葉舞，即《智論》四十七。餘如第二疏鈔。疏「法華安樂行令不親近二乘」者，經云「又不親近求聲聞比丘、比丘尼、優婆塞、優婆夷，亦不問迅。若於房中、若經行處、若在講堂中，不共住止。」即不令近也。「恐習成種」，即是疏釋。 > Regarding the Commentary's 'Nine: real and unreal,' etc.: the last two are in terms of persons. Regarding the Commentary's 'It also abandons the characteristics of the residual traces of the triyāna': the third fascicle of the Prajñāpāramitopadeśa says, 'Just as when fragrance is inside a vessel, though the fragrance is gone, the residual scent remains; and just as when a person is bound, when he first gains release, his body is still unhandy.' \[The story of\] Pilindavatsa scolding the goddess of the Ganges is also in the third fascicle of the treatise. Śāriputra's anger is also in the third fascicle of the treatise. It was that Śāriputra was the senior monk, and Rāhula was emaciated. The Buddha asked the reason. He spoke a verse, saying: 'If a person consumes oil, he gains strength; if he consumes ghee, he gains a fine complexion; he who consumes hemp dregs has no physical strength: the Greatly Virtuous World-Honoured One should naturally know this.' The Buddha asked, 'Who is your senior monk?' He answered, 'The preceptor Śāriputra.' The Buddha said, 'Śāriputra consumes impure food,' and ordered him to bake in the midday sun. Later \[the Buddha\] again ordered him to cease, but he refused to return, \[saying\] having already baked, it was unfitting to cease. The Buddha thereupon cited the past when he had been a snake that bit a king: a sorcerer prepared a fire pit and ordered him to suck out the venom, \[saying\] that if he did not suck it out, he must enter the fire pit. He thought to himself: 'I have already vomited it; how could I suck it back?' Thereupon he threw his body into the fire. Thus his habit of anger has not ceased even today. Mahākāśyapa dancing is in fascicle forty-seven of the Prajñāpāramitopadeśa. The rest is as in the subcommentary to the second fascicle of the Commentary. Regarding the Commentary's 'The \[chapter on\] "Comfortable Practice" in the Lotus Sūtra directs not approaching the two vehicles': the sūtra says, 'Furthermore, one should not approach or inquire after monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen who seek the śrāvaka \[vehicle\]. Whether in a room, in a place for walking meditation, or in a lecture hall, one does not reside or dwell together with them.' This means not letting one approach them. 'Fearing that the habit may form a seed' is the explanation of the Commentary. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 71.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71.42) - [Next: 71.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71.44) - [Up: 71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.71.43) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.71.43) · Pramāṇa