[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 72.11 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 72.11 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 72.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [72.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.11) 疏「第三行相」，論亦三節，疏亦先總分法義。「一生行相」者，論立名；次「現法緣」下，疏釋論名；後「設知」下，論重牒釋之意。疏中有二：先取意釋。論本文云「一一世現在世故」。從「故論云」下，明引論釋，釋上一一現在之言。二「已生」下，知義。先舉論、後「設知」下疏取義釋。具足，論云「見過去未來世知現在世，彼菩薩智境界成。」釋曰：疏文分二，先正取意釋、二「是則」下結示上二。云何逆見過未知現在耶？見過去法謝、未法未生，則知現在從未而生，必當謝滅。三四可知。 > In the Commentary, under “Third, activity characteristics,” the treatise also has three parts, and the Commentary also first divides dharma and meaning in general. “The activity characteristic of arising” is the name established by the treatise; next, from “Present conditions of dharmas” onward is the Commentary's explanation of the treatise's name; later, from “Supposing one knows” onward is the intention of the treatise's re-taking up and explaining. In the Commentary there are two: first, taking the general sense to explain it. The treatise's root text says: “Because each time is the present time.” From “Therefore the treatise says” onward, it clearly cites the treatise to explain, explaining the aforementioned words “each \[time\] is the present.” Second, from “Already arisen” onward is knowing meaning. First, citing the treatise; later, from “Supposing one knows” onward, the Commentary takes the sense to explain. In full, the treatise says: “Seeing the past and future times and knowing the present time constitutes the cognitive domain of that bodhisattva.” Explanation: The text of the Commentary is divided into two: first, directly taking the sense to explain; second, from “This, then” onward, concludes and indicates the two above. How does one retroactively see the past and future to know the present? Seeing that past dharmas have ceased and future dharmas have not yet arisen, one then knows that the present has arisen from the future and will certainly cease and pass away. The third and fourth can be understood. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 72.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.10) - [Next: 72.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.12) - [Up: 72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.72.11) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.11) · Pramāṇa