[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 72.24 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 72.24 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 72.24 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [72.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.24) 疏「一智相」下，即前釋法無礙。上句論標名、從「一切」下牒經解釋。有兩重徵釋。「何者」下，此徵法體，即經「法行智行」。後徵法智，何以名菩薩行？答意可知。「故經云」下，雙舉經論以帖。言「論云觀智說」者，論具云「是中一切菩薩行者，法行智行是現觀智說故。」疏「斯則異前義大」者，顯義無礙，即是說大。前法無礙是義大也。三中「巧說十地」者，釋方便言。從「授與眾生」下，釋無差別言，乃有二意：一稱機不倒為無差別、二不違證道為無差別，如鳥跡合空。 > In the commentary, from "first, the characteristic of cognition" onward, it explains the unhinderedness in Dharma discussed earlier. The first line of the treatise designates the name; from "all" onward, it cites the sūtra to explain it. There are two tiers of inquiry and explanation. From "What is it?" onward, this inquires into the essence of the Dharma, namely the sūtra's "practice of Dharma and practice of cognition." Later it inquires into the cognition of Dharma: why is it called the practice of a bodhisattva? The intended answer is clear. From "Hence the sūtra says" onward, both sūtra and treatise are cited together to substantiate it. As for "The treatise says it is spoken based on the cognition of observation": the treatise fully states: "Among these, 'all bodhisattva practices' are spoken based on the cognition of direct realization, which is the practice of Dharma and practice of cognition." The commentary's "This then differs from the previous greatness of meaning": this reveals that unhinderedness in meaning is the greatness of explanation, while the previous unhinderedness in Dharma is the greatness of meaning. In the third, "skillfully explaining the ten grounds" explains the word upāya. From "bestowing upon sentient beings" onward, it explains the words "without distinction," which has two meanings: first, matching the capacities \[of beings\] without error is "without distinction"; second, not contradicting the path of realization is "without distinction," like bird tracks coinciding with empty space. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 72.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.23) - [Next: 72.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.25) - [Up: 72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.72.24) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.72.24) · Pramāṇa