<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.18 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 74.18

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 74.18

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 74.18

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [74.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.18)

疏「三約雙遮」下，文有二意：一前明相即，故得雙遮。謂相本是異，今即性故，無有異也，故非異，性本是一，今即相故，無有一也，故非不異。二「又相非相」下，明當相自離，故得雙非。「故離二邊」下，結成玄旨。

> Under the commentary's "third, in terms of mutual negation," the text has two meanings: First, previously it clarified mutual identity, and therefore attains mutual negation. That is to say, marks are originally different, but now being identical with nature, there is no difference; hence they are not different. Nature is originally one, but now being identical with marks, there is no oneness; hence it is not not different. Second, under "Furthermore, marks are non-marks..." it clarifies that being fundamentally separate within their very marks, they therefore attain mutual negation. Under "Therefore, leaving the two extremes..." it concludes the profound purport.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 74.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.17)
- [Next: 74.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.19)
- [Up: 74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.74.18) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.74.18) · Pramāṇa
