<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.45 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 75.45

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 75.45

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 75.45

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [75.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.45)

疏「上之四門各雙存互奪以成四句」者，如第一常無常門云：一者常；二是無常；三合前，即成亦常亦無常，故云雙存；四約互奪，即成非常非無常，無常奪常故非常，常奪無常故非無常矣。謂正以體虛無實，即自性無常故。下三門例知也。

> Regarding the commentary's "The above four gates each preserve both and mutually negate to form the four propositions": as in the first gate of permanence and impermanence, it says: first is permanent; second is impermanent; third, combining the preceding, forms both permanent and impermanent, hence called "preserving both"; fourth, in terms of mutual negation, it forms neither permanent nor impermanent—impermanence negates permanence, hence neither permanent; permanence negates impermanence, hence not impermanent. This means precisely because the essence is devoid of reality, it is by self-nature impermanent. The three gates below should be understood by analogy.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 75.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.44)
- [Next: 75.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.46)
- [Up: 75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.75.45) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.75.45) · Pramāṇa
