<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.19 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 76.19

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 76.19

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 76.19

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [76.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.19)

疏「然其喻相」下，第二明喻相不同。於中有四：一唯將空喻對前六喻辨相不同；二「又此諸喻若約能喻」下，通辨七喻所破差別；三「又前六遣有」下，三重將空喻對六明空有不同，義成諸喻共喻於空，空喻却成於有；四「又上所喻即通一切」下，通辨七喻能所通局。言「此中能喻則具多義」者，謂如一空，有無相義、有無起義、一味義等。言「所喻各隨別義喻一類法」者，謂無相但喻事法界，無起但喻世界，一味但喻教法等故。

> Regarding the commentary's "However, their characteristics of analogy" downward: this is the second part, explaining the differences in the characteristics of the similes. Within it there are four: first, solely taking the simile of space to distinguish differences in characteristics against the preceding six similes; second, from "Furthermore, if these various similes are considered in terms of the vehicle of analogy" downward, it comprehensively distinguishes the differences in what is refuted by the seven similes; third, from "Furthermore, the preceding six dispel existence" downward, it for the third time takes the simile of space against the six to clarify the difference between emptiness and existence, meaning that the various similes together analogize emptiness, while the simile of space conversely accomplishes existence; fourth, from "Furthermore, what is analogized above pervades everything" downward, it comprehensively distinguishes the general and particular scope of what analogizes and what is analogized in the seven similes. "Here what analogizes possesses multiple meanings" means: like a single space, it has the meaning of marklessness, the meaning of non-arising, the meaning of single flavor, and so forth. "What is analogized each follows a distinct meaning to analogize a specific category of phenomena" means: marklessness only analogizes the dharmadhātu of phenomena, non-arising only analogizes the worlds, and single flavor only analogizes the teaching dharmas, and so forth.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 76.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.18)
- [Next: 76.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.20)
- [Up: 76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.76.19) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.76.19) · Pramāṇa
