[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 78.49 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.49 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.49 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [78.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.49) 疏「別謂此品」等者，疏文有二：先直就平等因果明、後「亦遠答」下對前問說。於中又二：先正對前問、後「前雖已答」下解妨。文中分三：初正答重難。謂先若未答，應須答之；〈不思議品〉已答，何須重答？故為此通。二「亦猶」下，引例。三「而妙中之妙」下，重通伏難。謂有難言：若例相海等，但是重答，何以別為平等因果？故為此通。「古德」等者，然平等因果乃是古意，為欲順古故為此通。若疏正意，欲將五品皆答所成果問，已如〈不思議品〉初說。 > Regarding the Commentary's statement, "Specifically, it refers to this chapter...", the text of the Commentary has two parts: first, directly elucidating with respect to the uniform cause and effect; second, from "It also distantly answers..." downward, explaining in relation to the previous questions. In this there are again two parts: first, directly addressing the previous questions; second, from "Although previously answered..." downward, resolving difficulties. The text is divided into three: first, directly answering the objection regarding repetition. That is to say, if it had not been answered before, it ought to be answered now; but since the "Inconceivable Chapter" had already answered it, why must it be answered again? Hence this resolution is made. Second, from "It is also like..." downward, citing precedents. Third, from "Yet the wondrous among the wondrous..." downward, repeatedly resolving the underlying objection. That is to say, someone might object: if it is by precedent like the Ocean of Characteristics, etc., then it is merely a repeated answer; why make it distinctively the uniform cause and effect? Hence this resolution is made. Regarding "The ancient masters...", the uniform cause and effect is in fact an ancient idea; in order to accord with the ancients, this resolution was made. If we take the primary intent of the Commentary, it is to take the five chapters as all answering the question of the fruit achieved, as already explained at the beginning of the "Inconceivable Chapter." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 78.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.48) - [Next: 78.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.50) - [Up: 78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.78.49) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.49) · Pramāṇa