[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 78.57 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.57 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.57 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [78.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.57) 疏「故晉經云：起一嗔心」等者，以今經譯者為順文令人誤解，故引三經以正其義。謂習禪者聞經不見諸法為大過惡，便云惡本性空，故云不見，見則妄想。雖是正理，不順今經，故引三經明是無惡過此，為不見有耳。「決定毘尼」者，經但一卷。優波離白佛言：「世尊！或有欲相應心而犯於戒、或有嗔相應心而犯於戒、或有癡相應心而犯於戒，何者為重？」佛言：「若有菩薩如恒河沙欲相應心而犯於戒、或有菩薩由一嗔心而犯於戒，因嗔犯者當知最重。所以者何？因嗔恚故能捨眾生。」乃至云「所有諸結能生親愛，菩薩於此不應生畏。所有諸結能捨眾生，菩薩於此應生大畏。」乃至云「大乘之人因欲犯戒，我說是人不名為犯。因嗔犯者，名大過惡，名大墮落，於佛法中是大留難。」 > Regarding the Commentary's statement, "Therefore the Jin sūtra says: 'giving rise to a single mind of anger...'" etc.: because the translator of the present sūtra, in order to make the text flow, caused people to misunderstand, three sūtras are cited to rectify its meaning. That is, meditation practitioners, hearing the sūtra say that not seeing dharmas is a great fault, then claim that evil is fundamentally empty in its nature, which is why it is said to not be seen, and that seeing it is conceptual proliferation. Although this is correct principle, it does not accord with the present sūtra; therefore, three sūtras are cited to clarify that no evil surpasses this, which is what is meant by not seeing it as existing. The Vinayaviniścaya consists of only one fascicle. Upāli addressed the Buddha, saying: "World-Honoured One! If there are those who violate the precepts with a mind associated with desire, or violate the precepts with a mind associated with anger, or violate the precepts with a mind associated with ignorance, which of these is the heaviest?" The Buddha said: "If there is a bodhisattva who, with a mind associated with desire as numerous as the sands of the Ganges, violates the precepts, or if there is a bodhisattva who, through a single mind of anger, violates the precepts, the violation due to anger should be known as the most severe. Why is this? Because due to anger, one can abandon sentient beings." Up to the statement: "Regarding all the fetters that can generate affection, a bodhisattva should not fear them. Regarding all the fetters that can abandon sentient beings, a bodhisattva should have great fear of them." Up to the statement: "If a person of the Great Vehicle violates the precepts due to desire, I say that this person is not called a violator. Violating them due to anger is called a great fault, is called a great fall, and is a great obstacle within the Buddha-Dharma." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 78.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.56) - [Next: 78.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.58) - [Up: 78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.78.57) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.57) · Pramāṇa