[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 78.5 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.5 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.5 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [78.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.5) 疏「無俟觀破摶聚」者，《金剛經》云「須菩提！於意云何！三千大千世界所有微塵是為多不！須菩提言：『甚多。世尊！』『須菩提！諸微塵，如來說非微塵，是名微塵。如來說世界，非世界，是名世界。』」釋曰：此段論名。第十色及眾生身摶取中觀破相應行住處，大意云：眾生世界但攬塵成，今從麁至細乃至極微皆無實體，故云世界即非世界。今云無俟觀破者，觀破但是假想，為未了者；若了法本空，不待觀破。又彼云摶取，今云摶聚，是義引耳。故什云：「欲破極微」，覺賢云：「以一故眾、以眾故一，微自無性則為空矣。」餘如前說。 > Regarding the Commentary's 'there is no need to contemplate and dismantle the gathered lump': the \*Diamond Sūtra\* says: 'Subhūti! What do you think? Are the dust motes in the great trichiliocosm many?' Subhūti said, 'Extremely many, World-Honoured One!' 'Subhūti, all these dust motes, the Tathāgata says are not dust motes; they are named dust motes. The Tathāgata says that worlds are not worlds; they are named worlds.' Explanation: this section discusses the name. In the tenth \[section\], on the practitioner's abiding place of contemplating and dismantling within the aggregated grasp of form and sentient beings' bodies, the general meaning is: the worlds of sentient beings are merely formed by gathering dust motes; now, examining from coarse to subtle down to the ultimate atom, none possess a real essence; hence it says that worlds are not worlds. Now saying 'there is no need to contemplate and dismantle' means that contemplating and dismantling is merely a provisional mental construct intended for those who have not yet understood; if one understands that phenomena are fundamentally empty, one does not wait to contemplate and dismantle them. Furthermore, that \[text\] says 'gathering by taking', while this \[text\] says 'gathering by clumping'; this is citation according to sense. Therefore Kumārajīva said: 'Desiring to break down the ultimate atom'; Buddhabhadra said: 'Because of the one there is the many; because of the many there is the one. The atom itself has no nature, and is thus empty.' The rest is as explained before. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 78.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.4) - [Next: 78.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.6) - [Up: 78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.78.5) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.78.5) · Pramāṇa