[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 79.39 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 79.39 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 79.39 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [79.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79.39) 疏「此即涅槃」下，會《涅槃》第九。初明三罪最重，有涅槃因，不說闡提；後〈聖行品〉下收闡提，云「一闡提人雖復斷善，猶有佛性。」故總收之。此四明至惡不捨。言三罪者，一謗方等經、二犯四重禁、三作五逆罪。此三未必撥無因果，撥無因果即一闡提。 > From the Commentary's "This is the Nirvāṇa..." downwards, it harmonizes with the ninth fascicle of the Nirvāṇa\[-sūtra\]. First it clarifies that the three transgressions are the heaviest, yet possess the cause of nirvāṇa, and does not mention icchantikas; later, from the "Chapter on Noble Practice" downwards, it includes icchantikas, saying: "Although icchantikas have severed their roots of goodness, they still possess the Buddha-nature." Therefore it embraces them all. These four clarify that even the most evil are not abandoned. As for the three transgressions: first, slandering the vaipulya sūtras; second, committing the four grave offenses; third, committing the five heinous sins. These three do not necessarily repudiate cause and effect; repudiating cause and effect is \[the mark of\] an icchantika. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 79.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79.38) - [Next: 79.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79.40) - [Up: 79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.79.39) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.79.39) · Pramāṇa