[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 80.35 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 80.35 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 80.35 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [80.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80.35) 疏「今初八相之中」下，疏文有四：初略消經文、二會《淨名》、三對前揀異、四廣徵釋。疏「此文正同」下，第二會《淨名》。於中三：初正顯同、二出彼經意、三正會釋。今初，即〈菩薩品〉。彌勒為兜率天子說不退轉地之行，淨名難云：「為從如生得授記耶？為從如滅得授記耶？若以如生得授記者，如無有生；若以如滅得授記者，如無有滅。一切眾生皆如也，一切法亦如也，眾聖賢亦如也，至於彌勒亦如也。若彌勒得授記者，一切眾生亦應授記。所以者何？夫如者不二不異。若彌勒得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者，一切眾生皆亦應得。所以者何？一切眾生即菩提相。若彌勒得滅度者，一切眾生亦當滅度。所以者何？諸佛知一切眾生畢竟寂滅，即涅槃相，不復更滅。」釋曰：今正釋成正覺義，故但引菩提。若據經文，云「乃至入涅槃」，則亦有亦當滅度之義，故今具引耳。 > Regarding the commentary's "Now first, among the eight aspects" and so forth: the commentary text has four parts: first, briefly explaining the sūtra text; second, harmonizing with the Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa; third, distinguishing differences from what precedes; fourth, broadly inquiring and explaining. In the commentary, from "This text directly accords with" downward is the second, harmonizing with the Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa. Within this there are three parts: first, directly showing identity; second, presenting that sūtra's intent; third, directly harmonizing and explaining. Now, as for the first: this is the "Bodhisattva Chapter." Maitreya was preaching the practice of the stage of non-retrogression to the gods of Tuṣita heaven, and Vimalakīrti challenged him, saying: "Did you receive the prophecy from the arising of tathatā, or did you receive the prophecy from the cessation of tathatā? If you received the prophecy from the arising of tathatā, tathatā has no arising; if you received the prophecy from the cessation of tathatā, tathatā has no cessation. All sentient beings are tathatā; all dharmas are also tathatā; all holy ones and sages are also tathatā; right up to Maitreya, he is also tathatā. If Maitreya received the prophecy, all sentient beings should also receive the prophecy. Why is this? Tathatā is neither dual nor different. If Maitreya attains anuttarasamyaksaṃbodhi, all sentient beings should also attain it. Why is this? All sentient beings are themselves the mark of bodhi. If Maitreya attains extinction, all sentient beings should also attain extinction. Why is this? The Buddhas know that all sentient beings are ultimately quiescent and extinguished—that is the mark of nirvāṇa, not extinguishing again." Commentary: Here it directly explains the meaning of attaining right awakening; hence it only cites bodhi. If based on the sūtra text, it says "even unto entering nirvāṇa," and thus also contains the meaning that \[sentient beings\] should also attain extinction; hence it is now cited in full. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 80.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80.34) - [Next: 80.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80.36) - [Up: 80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.80.35) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.80.35) · Pramāṇa