[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [勝鬘寶窟](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744) › 1.15 # 勝鬘寶窟 1.15 勝鬘寶窟 1.15 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1.15) 問：對二對三，言似相違，云何通會？答：此猶是一義，無相違也。三是通明，二是別說。三是通明者，三中之一即是一乘，是彼二乘故名三。言二乘者，但明三中之二此非真實，三中之一謂真實也。 > Question: In contrasting with two and contrasting with three, the statements seem contradictory; how are they reconciled? Answer: This is still a single meaning and there is no contradiction. Three is the common explanation; two is the specific discourse. Three being the common explanation: the one among the three is the ekayāna, and because of those two vehicles they are called three. Speaking of two vehicles: it only clarifies that the two among the three are not real, while the one among the three is real. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1.14) - [Next: 1.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1.16) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744~en-mt.1.15) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1744.1.15) · Pramāṇa