<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.42 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [觀無量壽佛經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753) › 1.42

# 觀無量壽佛經疏 1.42

觀無量壽佛經疏 1.42

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.42)

問曰：「若爾者，《法華經》云：『一稱南無佛，皆已成佛道。』亦應成佛竟也。此之二文，有何差別？」

> Question: 'If so, the Lotus Sūtra says: "If one utters 'Namo Buddhāya' even once, all have already attained the Buddha path." They should also have completed Buddhahood. What is the difference between these two texts?'  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.41)
- [Next: 1.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.43)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753~en-mt.1.42) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1753.1.42) · Pramāṇa
