[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 12.78 # 大般涅槃經集解 12.78 大般涅槃經集解 12.78 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [12.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12.78) 案僧亮曰：油譬取，明譬煩惱也。而器無常，非如來者，器義相似，少分譬也。如來體之故名為常者，昔但說結滅是常，不說體之者常，是有餘也。法瑤曰：上引無餘四句亦是口密，但未正表昔教，是覆相說；今正明也。 > Sengliang states: "The oil is an analogy for grasping; the light is an analogy for afflictions. As for 'the vessel is impermanent and not the Tathāgata,' the meaning of the vessel is analogous, a partial metaphor. 'The Tathāgata embodies it, therefore it is called permanent' means that in the past he only spoke of the extinction of fetters being permanent, but did not say that the one who embodies it is permanent; that was \[nirvāṇa\] with remainder." Fayao states: "The four phrases on \[nirvāṇa\] without remainder cited above are also the secret of speech, but they did not directly manifest the past teaching as an elliptical exposition; now he directly clarifies it." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 12.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12.77) - [Next: 12.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12.79) - [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.12.78) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.12.78) · Pramāṇa