[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 14.10 # 大般涅槃經集解 14.10 大般涅槃經集解 14.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [14.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14.10) 案僧宗曰：我者常見，無我者斷見也。非我非無我者，此第四家計也。𨷂第三家。第三家云亦我，則不同第一家；亦非我，復不同第二家。所言不同者，謂不全同，乃片同耳。今第四家復異第三家也，言非我者，不同第三家斥我也；言非無我者，不同第三家斥無我也。雖有此言，及其撿覈，亦不得異第三家之也。 > Sengzong states: 'Self' is eternalism, and 'non-self' is annihilationism. 'Neither self nor non-self' is the proposition of the fourth school. The third school is omitted here. The third school says 'both self', which is not the same as the first school, and 'and non-self', which again is not the same as the second school. In saying they are 'not the same', this means they are not entirely the same, but only partially the same. Now the fourth school differs again from the third school: saying 'neither self' is not the same as the third school's refutation of self; saying 'nor non-self' is not the same as the third school's refutation of non-self. Although there are these statements, when examined and verified, it also cannot be different from the third school. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 14.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14.9) - [Next: 14.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14.11) - [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.14.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.14.10) · Pramāṇa