[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 18.55 # 大般涅槃經集解 18.55 大般涅槃經集解 18.55 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [18.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.55) 案僧亮曰：先說倒體，亦應對明，但經文略耳。僧宗曰：此下先明苦中生樂想之倒也，乃未應辨非苦中苦想。今顯其倒緣，有此計者謂必得理，遂於生死之中橫計樂想故也。寶亮曰：辨初倒中有三翻，先明後倒、次明前倒、第三舉後倒以結句也。就初明佛上倒中有四意：第一先開章門、第二釋章門、第三云如來是行苦、第四言佛是壞苦。若如是計者，是則大罪苦人也。智秀曰：辨初倒中有三翻。第一訖「而生苦想，此名顛倒」，將顯苦上有樂迷，故辨苦體也。有二意：初就理中明其倒相，後是經家結其倒想也。此即第一。若於樂上起苦想者，必得苦果，而謂我則受樂，是則於苦而起樂惑。 > Sengliang says: "He first speaks of the nature of the inversion. It should also be explained by way of contrast, but the sūtra text is brief." Sengzong says: "From here down, he first clarifies the inversion of conceiving bliss within suffering; it has not yet distinguished conceiving suffering within non-suffering. Now he reveals the conditions of the inversion: those who hold this calculation suppose they will certainly attain the principle, and consequently within saṃsāra falsely reckon the conception of bliss." Baoliang says: "Discriminating the first inversion comprises three turns: first, clarifying the latter inversion; next, clarifying the former inversion; third, adducing the latter inversion to conclude the clause. Regarding the first, clarifying the inversion regarding the Buddha, there are four points: first, opening the heading; second, explaining the heading; third, saying that the Tathāgata is the suffering of conditioning; fourth, saying that the Buddha is the suffering of destruction. If one calculates like this, this is a person of the suffering of great transgression." Zhixiu says: "Discriminating the first inversion comprises three turns. The first ends at 'yet produces the conception of suffering; this is called an inversion.' About to reveal that there is delusion about bliss on top of suffering, he therefore discriminates the nature of suffering. There are two points: first, clarifying its inverted characteristics in terms of the principle; later, the compiler of the sūtra concludes its inverted conception. This is the first. If one gives rise to the conception of suffering regarding bliss, one will certainly obtain a suffering result, yet one claims 'I then experience bliss'; this is giving rise to the delusion of bliss regarding suffering." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 18.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.54) - [Next: 18.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.56) - [Up: 18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.18.55) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.55) · Pramāṇa