[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 18.65 # 大般涅槃經集解 18.65 大般涅槃經集解 18.65 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [18.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.65) 案僧亮曰：惑者謂常則不滅、滅則不常，釋所以是苦行也。云何捨身者，樂則不應捨而捨，故知是苦，此釋所以是壞苦也。寶亮曰：此下第三還舉後倒，結前句也。智秀曰：正明樂上起苦見為倒也。有三意：第一約理辨其是倒、第二經家結其成倒、第三出彼見之意也。 > Sengliang says: "The deluded person thinks that what is permanent does not perish, and what perishes is not permanent; this explains why it is the suffering of conditioning. As for 'how could he discard the body?': if it were bliss, he should not discard it, yet he discards it, so we know it is suffering; this explains why it is the suffering of destruction." Baoliang says: "From here down is the third, returning to adducing the latter inversion to conclude the earlier clause." Zhixiu says: "This properly clarifies that giving rise to the view of suffering regarding bliss is an inversion. There are three points: first, discriminating that it is an inversion according to principle; second, the compiler of the sūtra concludes that it constitutes an inversion; third, presenting the intention of that view." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 18.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.64) - [Next: 18.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.66) - [Up: 18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.18.65) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.18.65) · Pramāṇa