[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 20.24 # 大般涅槃經集解 20.24 大般涅槃經集解 20.24 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [20.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.24) 案。僧亮曰：不應有聖默然也。《思益》以諸法空故，名聖默然，此無對句也。僧宗曰：若生死有我者，及撿問之時，何故默然耶？寶亮曰：不應如犢子道人之所計也。如此諸句，勸厲行人應當推理而會中道。 > Sengliang comments: There should not be a noble silence. In the Viśeṣacintā-\[brahma-paripṛcchā-sūtra\], because all dharmas are empty, it is called noble silence; here there is no corresponding antithesis. Sengzong says: If there were a self in saṃsāra, when it was investigated and questioned, why was there silence? Baoliang says: One should not grasp it as the Vātsīputrīya renunciants do. Statements such as these encourage practitioners to infer the principle and thereby accord with the Middle Way. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 20.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.23) - [Next: 20.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.25) - [Up: 20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.20.24) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.24) · Pramāṇa