[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 20.36 # 大般涅槃經集解 20.36 大般涅槃經集解 20.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [20.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.36) 案道生曰：因緣不得相離。因緣有故，學得成佛，豈離無我而有我耶？僧宗曰：此第八，正理也。如智人所解，因果之相關也。寶亮曰：就昔教之時，不作我無我。若就今教，故不俟言也。我者，據佛果；無我者，據生死。論實相之中，則無別也。 > Daosheng comments: Cause and condition cannot be separated. Because causes and conditions exist, through training one is able to attain Buddhahood; how could there be a self apart from non-self? Sengzong says: This is the eighth section, the correct principle. As understood by the wise, cause and fruit are interrelated. Baoliang says: In the time of the past teaching, self and non-self were not formulated. In terms of the present teaching, it goes without saying. "Self" is based on the Buddha-fruit; "non-self" is based on saṃsāra. When discussed within the true mark, there is no difference. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 20.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.35) - [Next: 20.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.37) - [Up: 20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.20.36) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.36) · Pramāṇa