[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 20.58 # 大般涅槃經集解 20.58 大般涅槃經集解 20.58 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [20.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.58) 案僧亮曰：因緣中道離有無，諸佛上所說有中道義味，故有問也。僧宗曰：上舉三關，明自他有過。許從乳生，理未可見。假作定有定無之難，使中道之旨顯也。 > Sengliang states: The Middle Way of causal conditions is free from existence and non-existence. What the Buddhas explained above possesses the flavor of the Middle Way's principle, hence the question is asked. Sengzong states: Above, the three gates were raised to explain that self-production and other-production entail errors. Although production from milk was admitted, the principle has not yet been seen. A challenge assuming definite existence and definite non-existence is hypothetically raised in order to make the import of the Middle Way manifest. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 20.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.57) - [Next: 20.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.59) - [Up: 20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.20.58) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.20.58) · Pramāṇa