<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.82 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 24.82

# 大般涅槃經集解 24.82

大般涅槃經集解 24.82

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [24.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.82)

案寶亮曰：上已廣略兩重明常，復答二十餘問竟，乃結果云：純陀住十住地，所作成辦。當知理教可徵也。何應指說陀羅尼呪，而頓有六萬四千人得無生忍者。故知昔教定是方便，今教定是真實。若昔純不數以方便唱云有人得道者，則下愚入道之心不勤。

> Baoliang states: Above, permanence was already clarified in two layers, extensive and brief, and after answering the more than twenty questions, the final result states: Cunda abides in the ten stages (daśabhūmi), and that which was to be done is accomplished. One should know that doctrine and teaching can be verified. How could it be that merely pointing out and reciting a dhāraṇī mantra suddenly caused sixty-four thousand people to attain the forbearance of non-arising? Therefore, we know that the past teaching was certainly an upāya, and the present teaching is certainly the real truth. If in the past he had not repeatedly used upāya to proclaim that someone had attained the path, then the minds of the lowly and foolish would not be diligent in entering the path.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 24.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.81)
- [Next: 24.83](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.83)
- [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.24.82) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.24.82) · Pramāṇa
