[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 32.60 # 大般涅槃經集解 32.60 大般涅槃經集解 32.60 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [32.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32.60) 案法瑤曰：苦理實爾，可以名定，審為實諦也。又名菩薩辨苦得實為實諦也。下三諦義亦同也。如來非諦，具如前解，故不句句釋。僧宗曰：第二重釋所以也，言是無常遷流斷壞之法也。寶亮曰：第二階釋異也。何以故如來之實非四諦實？苦者是可斷除法，如來實不可斷除，故不同也。 > Fayao notes: "The principle of suffering is truly so, can be determined by name, and is examined as the truth of reality. It also means that a bodhisattva, distinguishing suffering and attaining the real, takes it as the truth of reality. The meaning of the three truths below is also the same. That the Tathāgata is not a truth has been explained in full above, and so is not explained line by line." Sengzong notes: "The second layer explains the reason, saying that it is an impermanent, fluctuating, severed, and destructible dharma." Baoliang notes: "The second stage explains the difference. Why is the Tathāgata's reality not the reality of the four truths? Suffering is a dharma that can be severed, whereas the Tathāgata's reality cannot be severed; therefore they are not the same." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 32.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32.59) - [Next: 32.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32.61) - [Up: 32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.32.60) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.32.60) · Pramāṇa