[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 36.29 # 大般涅槃經集解 36.29 大般涅槃經集解 36.29 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [36.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36.29) 案寶亮曰：此云論義經。夫理相幽微，若不假以往復，則於義不彰，故取論議之事別為一部也。然此十二盡有文理，如火宅一偈，若脩多羅往取，則舉體是法本也；若以偈頌往擬，便是祇夜；語之是譬，即譬喻經。如此三義，即是三家文，是為無有有理而無文，但文而無理也。 > Baoliang states: Here it is translated as “treatise sūtras.” The characteristics of the principle are subtle and profound; if one does not rely upon reciprocal questioning and refutation, the meaning will not be made manifest; hence the matter of debate is taken separately as a division. Now, these twelve all possess both text and principle. For example, regarding the single verse of the burning house: if approached from the standpoint of sūtra, its entire substance is the root of Dharma; if compared as a versified gāthā, it is geya; if spoken as a metaphor, it is an avadāna sūtra. These three meanings are precisely the texts of the three divisions. Thus there is no principle without text, nor merely text without principle. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 36.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36.28) - [Next: 36.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36.30) - [Up: 36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.36.29) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.36.29) · Pramāṇa