[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 4.65 # 大般涅槃經集解 4.65 大般涅槃經集解 4.65 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4.65) 案法瑤曰：前三難明極已未極不得等也，此一難明受用不受用也。受用則獲五果，不用則無不應等也。僧宗曰：受用者則有所資，資故消化，施主還得無常果也。若無受無資，應迹而已，理獲常報也。 > Fayao comments: The previous three objections clarified that having reached the ultimate versus not having reached the ultimate cannot be equal; this single objection clarifies receiving and using versus not receiving and using. Receiving and using brings the five fruits; not using brings none, so they should not be equal. Sengzong says: One who receives and uses it has something that nourishes him; because it nourishes, it is digested, and the donor in turn obtains an impermanent fruit. If there is no receiving and no nourishing, it is merely a manifested trace, and in principle one secures a permanent retribution. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4.64) - [Next: 4.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4.66) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.4.65) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.4.65) · Pramāṇa