[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 46.40 # 大般涅槃經集解 46.40 大般涅槃經集解 46.40 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [46.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.40) 案道生曰：橫起故有生。生若常者，則不得生於有漏。有漏無生，何由起耶？僧亮曰：第一句以本無今有為生也。若有漏無生，則非有漏。有漏橫起是名為生，無漏不橫故非生也。無常之性，生時即滅，即滅之生，不能生物，則有漏無生；無生即常，亦非有漏也。寶亮曰：若法不為生相所生，則有漏之法無生相；若無生相，則非有漏。 > Daosheng notes: Because of perverse arising, there is birth. If birth were permanent, it could not produce the defiled. If the defiled has no birth, whence does it arise? Sengliang notes: The first proposition takes what originally did not exist and now exists as birth. If the defiled has no birth, it is not defiled. The perverse arising of the defiled is called birth; the undefiled does not arise perversely, so it is not birth. The nature of impermanence is extinguished as soon as it is born; birth that is immediately extinguished cannot produce things, so the defiled has no birth; having no birth, it is permanent, and also not defiled. Baoliang notes: If dharmas are not produced by the mark of birth, then defiled dharmas have no mark of birth; if they have no mark of birth, they are not defiled. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 46.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.39) - [Next: 46.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.41) - [Up: 46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.46.40) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.40) · Pramāṇa