[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 46.44 # 大般涅槃經集解 46.44 大般涅槃經集解 46.44 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [46.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.44) 案道生曰：若變成所生，則無復自性也。僧亮曰：第三句。生無自性者，自生則一體有二也，一謂能生、二謂受生，受則非能、能則非受，失其性也。寶亮曰：亦應先定難也。應云為是自性能生於法？為是因緣故能生耶？今𨷂此定也。 > Daosheng notes: If it turns into that which is produced, it no longer has self-nature. Sengliang notes: The third proposition. That birth lacks self-nature means: if it produces itself, one entity would have two aspects: first, being that which can produce, and second, receiving production; receiving is not producing, and producing is not receiving, thus losing its nature. Baoliang notes: One should also first posit the objection: it should say, does it produce dharmas by self-nature? Or does it produce by causes and conditions? It now lacks this premise. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 46.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.43) - [Next: 46.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.45) - [Up: 46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.46.44) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.44) · Pramāṇa