[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 46.62 # 大般涅槃經集解 46.62 大般涅槃經集解 46.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [46.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.62) 案道生曰：前已離生，今離不生也。僧亮曰：若法無生相，亦不可定說也。此六句，通答後二句也。僧宗曰：生本對不生，生既不可得，豈有不生而可得耶？寶亮曰：亦不可定說法外若無別生之相，便使法體不復得生也。 > Daosheng says: Previously he already set aside birth; now he sets aside non-birth. Sengliang says: If a dharma lacks the characteristic of birth, that likewise cannot be stated definitively. These six lines comprehensively answer the latter two propositions. Sengzong says: Birth originally stands in contrast to non-birth; since birth is ungraspable, how could non-birth be graspable? Baoliang says: One also cannot state definitively that if there were no separate characteristic of birth outside the dharma, this would cause the substance of the dharma to be incapable of being born. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 46.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.61) - [Next: 46.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.63) - [Up: 46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.46.62) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.46.62) · Pramāṇa