[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 5.8 # 大般涅槃經集解 5.8 大般涅槃經集解 5.8 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5.8) 案僧亮曰：證諸行不可請也。僧宗曰：此偈中亦可亂明無常苦等諸過也。今隨義關者，初三偈半，無常門。次眾苦輪一偈，苦門也。次有道者，謂二十五有，此半偈空門也。次可壞法兩偈半，無我門也。已有如斯之過，故云如蠶處繭不自在也。此身苦所集一偈半，不淨門也。 > Sengliang comments: This proves that conditioned phenomena cannot be requested \[to remain\]. Sengzong says: In these verses one could also randomly explain the various faults of impermanence, suffering, and so forth. Now, following the conceptual connections: The first three and a half stanzas are the gate of impermanence. The next stanza on the wheel of all sufferings is the gate of suffering. Next, 'the paths of existence' refers to the twenty-five states of existence; this half-stanza is the gate of emptiness. The next two and a half stanzas on destructible phenomena are the gate of non-self. Already possessing faults such as these, it says 'like a silkworm in a cocoon, without autonomy'. The stanza and a half on 'this body is an accumulation of suffering' is the gate of impurity. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5.7) - [Next: 5.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5.9) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.5.8) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.5.8) · Pramāṇa