[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 52.50 # 大般涅槃經集解 52.50 大般涅槃經集解 52.50 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [52.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52.50) 案僧亮曰：釋所以不說見說者之過也。寶亮曰：既已略明因緣之法非定有定無，下即出惑體以對之。從緣起，所以非無也；貪無自性，所以非有也。貪之與解脫，皆無自性也。 > Sengliang states: This explains why he does not state the faults of those who hold such views. Baoliang says: Having already briefly clarified that conditioned phenomena are neither definitively existent nor definitively non-existent, below he brings forth the substance of delusion to contrast with it. Arising from conditions, it is therefore not non-existent; greed lacks self-nature, it is therefore not existent. Both greed and liberation lack self-nature. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 52.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52.49) - [Next: 52.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52.51) - [Up: 52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.52.50) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.52.50) · Pramāṇa