<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.78 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 56.78

# 大般涅槃經集解 56.78

大般涅槃經集解 56.78

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [56.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.78)

案僧亮曰：更以七難明佛無性，而成顯佛性非無，成上不失壞之義。初以天人證佛性無成也。寶亮曰：第五翻，觀因中立性也。雖難有七，然多執緣，難使無正因也。此第一難云：若因中本無者，則無正因唯有緣因，故得佛耳。

> Sengliang comments: He further uses seven objections to argue that the Buddha has no nature, thereby establishing and revealing that the buddhadhātu is not non-existent, establishing the above meaning of being indestructible. First, he uses devas and humans to prove that the buddhadhātu has no accomplishment. Baoliang comments: The fifth turn: examining the positing of nature within the cause. Although there are seven objections, they mostly cling to conditions, arguing so as to eliminate the direct cause. This first objection states: if it originally does not exist in the cause, then there is no direct cause, but only contributory causes, through which one attains Buddhahood.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 56.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.77)
- [Next: 56.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.79)
- [Up: 56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.56.78) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.56.78) · Pramāṇa
