[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 57.28 # 大般涅槃經集解 57.28 大般涅槃經集解 57.28 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [57.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.28) 案僧亮曰：二手合時更無異法而來合者，合一是果，手二是因，而離手無合也；名色眾生亦爾。寶亮曰：若名色異，眾生者可得言縛；今名色與縛一體，如眼不自見，云何名色繫縛名色耶？佛答：以二手共合，更無別合法，即手為合，故即名色為縛也。 > Sengliang comments: When the two hands join together, no other dharma comes to join them: joining as one is the effect, the two hands are the cause, and apart from the hands there is no joining; name-and-form and sentient beings are also like this. Baoliang says: If name-and-form were different from sentient beings, one could say they bind; now name-and-form and bondage are one substance, just as the eye does not see itself—how can name-and-form bind name-and-form? The Buddha answers: because the two hands join together, there is no separate dharma of joining; the hands themselves are the joining; therefore, name-and-form itself is the bondage. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 57.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.27) - [Next: 57.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.29) - [Up: 57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.57.28) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.28) · Pramāṇa