[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 57.36 # 大般涅槃經集解 57.36 大般涅槃經集解 57.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [57.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.36) 案僧亮曰：以明譬眾生，後以眾生譬燈。即以明為燈，油是生因。今煩惱是眾生成因，竟以何為譬耳？寶亮曰：師子吼還更執明燈之與油二物各異，若言眾生即縛者，此非譬也。 > Sengliang comments: Light was used as an analogy for sentient beings, and later sentient beings were compared to a lamp. That is, light is the lamp, and oil is the cause of arising. Now, affliction is the cause of the sentient being's formation; in the end, what is used as an analogy for what? Baoliang says: Siṃhanāda again clings to the lamp's light and the oil being two distinct objects; if one says that the sentient being is the bondage itself, then this is not an analogy. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 57.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.35) - [Next: 57.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.37) - [Up: 57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.57.36) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.36) · Pramāṇa