[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 57.74 # 大般涅槃經集解 57.74 大般涅槃經集解 57.74 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [57.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.74) 案僧亮曰：因有三種，正因、緣因則別，境界因則共也。何者？三達智。一法不知，則非佛三世因緣也。各各有則無常者，謂彼佛所知、此佛不知，不知故惑不盡，佛應無常也。寶亮曰：第三段，明道性平等也。將欲廣明此理，故先作問也。 > Sengliang remarks: "There are three kinds of causes: direct causes and conditioning causes are distinct, while the objective realm cause is shared. Why so? It is the wisdom of the three clear knowledges. If a single dharma is not known, it is not the Buddha's causes and conditions of the three periods of time. Saying that if each possesses it, it would be impermanent, means: what that Buddha knows, this Buddha would not know; because of not knowing, delusions would not be exhausted, and the Buddha would have to be impermanent." Baoliang says: "The third section clarifies the equality of the nature of the path. Intending to clarify this principle broadly, he first raises this question." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 57.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.73) - [Next: 57.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.75) - [Up: 57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.57.74) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.57.74) · Pramāṇa