[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 63.35 # 大般涅槃經集解 63.35 大般涅槃經集解 63.35 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [63.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.35) 案僧亮曰：此明無慧也。若善由解生，則不可斷；不從解生，遇耶則斷。昔雖誦讀，不由解生，亦不可救。答第二難也。善知相法者，知有二種現知相知也。言佛非現知，非一切知也。僧宗曰：雖受十二部經，不解旨故，所以退謗，乃至斷善根。況不受持，云何救耶？ > Sengliang comments: This clarifies the absence of wisdom. If good arises from understanding, it cannot be severed; if it does not arise from understanding, encountering perversity will sever it. Though he recited and chanted in the past, it did not arise from understanding, so he could not be saved either. This answers the second objection. 'One who knows well the characteristics of phenomena' refers to knowing having two kinds: direct knowing and inferential knowing of characteristics. He said the Buddha does not know directly, nor is he omniscient. Sengzong comments: Although he received the twelve divisions of the canon, because he did not understand their import, he regressed and slandered, even severing his good roots. How much less could he be saved if he had not upheld them? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 63.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.34) - [Next: 63.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.36) - [Up: 63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.63.35) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.35) · Pramāṇa