<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.69 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 63.69

# 大般涅槃經集解 63.69

大般涅槃經集解 63.69

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [63.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.69)

案僧亮曰：乘上正因不斷之辭以為問也。正因之力必感佛果，果善因善二俱不斷，故知非闡提也。智秀曰：第四翻，承上不斷性之旨，仍以為難也。佛性是善，闡提不能斷，云何成闡提也。

> Sengliang comments: He takes the preceding statement that the direct cause is unsevered to formulate the question. The power of the direct cause will definitely induce the Buddha-fruit; since both fruit-good and cause-good are unsevered, one knows he is not an icchantika. Zhixiu comments: The fourth round: taking up the import of not severing the nature to press an objection. Buddhadhātu is good; if the icchantika cannot sever it, how does he become an icchantika?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 63.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.68)
- [Next: 63.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.70)
- [Up: 63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.63.69) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.63.69) · Pramāṇa
